PLAN FOR UPSTATE VIZNITZ COMMUNITY TO INCORPORATE INTO THEIR OWN VILLAGE HALTED BY LAWSUIT




The Viznitz kehilla, located in Kiamesha Lake in the Catskills, is seeking to incorporate their own 1.5-square-mile village, to be known as "Village of Ateres."


The proposed community is expected to house over 500 residents, with the majority coming from the Chasidic community.


The kehilla filed a petition for their proposal, asserting that it complies with the area requirements outlined in the New York Village Law, ensuring that the proposed village does not exceed five square miles.


New York law dictates that a public hearing must be held to address any objections to the legal sufficiency of the petition. Therefore the initial legal hurdle to clear was the holding of these public hearings.


At the time, Kehilla members were concerned that Thompson Town Supervisor, Bill Rieber Jr. would deem their petition invalid - which could lead to a legal battle in the court system - after he publicly stated that he’s concerned that the motivation behind the incorporation of the Village of Ateres is so they could gain control over housing regulations, which would permit them to build denser housing upstate as well.


(Of interest is that Viznitz currently has their own Village of Kaser, located in the Monsey area. Viznitz established Kaser in 1990 so they could build denser housing.)


Opponents who spoke at the first hearing objected to adding a new layer of government and found fault with the petition itself, arguing enough of its 99 signatures were flawed to render it invalid.


After weighing that testimony and a flood of written comments, in August, Thompson Supervisor Bill Rieber and Fallsburg Supervisor Kathy Rappaport voided 25 of the 99 signatures but did not deem the petition invalid.


As their review deemed the petition valid, the proposal had formally cleared its first hurdle. Had no lawsuit to challenge the petition in court been filed within 30 days, Rieber and Rappaport would have scheduled a referendum for the roughly 320 adults currently living in the proposed village. That vote would have likely ushered into existence New York's newest municipality.


However, this proposal has now been halted due to a lawsuit.


Two homeowners, Steven Rivela and John Reeves, whose properties were included in the proposed village of Ateres, filed a lawsuit alleging that additional faults bring the valid signature total to fewer than the legal minimum of 65. Their two claims: 13 signers weren't registered voters and might not be qualified to vote in Thompson or Fallsburg in the referendum; and nine other signatures didn't match the ones on record for those voters and may have been forged.


The case, filed by Monticello attorney Steven Mogel, is now pending in state Supreme Court in Monticello before Justice James Farrell.


The pending court case, which seeks to invalidate 22 petition signatures, puts on hold any vote by residents of the nearly 1.5-square-mile area in the Catskills that would become New York's newest municipality.


Zev Tarkletaub, one of the organizers, previously told the USA Today Network that residents sought that step mainly to enhance services that are important to the Hasidic community, such as sidewalks and streetlights for pedestrian safety. Having their own government would ensure those priorities are met, he argued.


He dismissed concerns that a new village with zoning control would foster excessive development, saying that residents moved to Sullivan for its rural character and don't want to live amidst dense housing.


The population of 834 adults and children living in the Ateres area meets one of the state's few requirements for forming a village: that it have at least 500 inhabitants.


Two bills that state lawmakers passed in June would update and expand village incorporation rules, including raising the population threshold to 2,000. If signed into law, either proposal could pose a new obstacle for Ateres and another Hasidic village proposed in neighboring Orange County. The village of Seven Springs proposal in the town of Monroe surfaced in 2018 and has been tied up in litigation.


Both village incorporation bills were approved in Albany three months ago and are awaiting decisions by Gov. Kathy Hochul to sign or veto them. She has until the end of the year to do so.


In their joint statement, Rieber and Rappaport said the century-old state law for village formations gives no consideration to their future environmental impact, such as water and sewer needs, or other factors like road improvement costs or hiring new municipal employees. It also ignores the fact that New York has been seeking to shed — not add — layers of government by encouraging villages to dissolve or merge.


"Fortunately, the Assembly and Senate agree, having both approved an updated bill which awaits Gov. Hochul’s signature," they wrote. "We are governed by the current law, absent the Governor’s signature."


Viznitz endorsed Hochul in the primary election. However, they distanced themselves from her in the general election race, despite that she personally visited their Askanim during the heat of the race in a bid to gain their support.


However, Skver and Satmar’s Aronim faction (which are both closely related to the proposed Seven Springs village) did strongly support Hochul in the general election race.


To join a FAA News WhatsApp Group, click here.


To join the FAA News WhatsApp Status, click here.


No comments: