FIRST REPORT
Lakewood’s Township Committee has decided that it is high time to address the need for more dormitories and mid-rise residential apartment buildings in the Township.
The Committee is set today to heroically introduce Ordinance 2024-034 which will create and adopt standards for a School Overlay Zone.
The proposed Ordinance highlights an apparent major concern of the Township Committee:
WHEREAS, Lakewood Township continues to experience rapid population growth with a need for additional public and private schools for its residents; and
WHEREAS, the continued construction of schools in various zones in an often haphazard fashion adversely impacts traffic flow throughout Lakewood Township; and
WHEREAS, these conditions support the creation of an overlay zone in a rapidly developing section of the southwest portion of the township to facilitate both the orderly construction of schools and associated residential development for students and faculty along with necessary road and utility infrastructure.
The propose heroic solution to this apparent big issue is the creation of the School Overlay Zone which "is intended to provide an optional development technique for residential and school development, consistent with the goals of the Township of Lakewood, and to facilitate the development of infrastructure, including new and improved roadways, potable water extensions, sanitary sewer extensions and stormwater management facilities to support the proposed development."
As depicted in the map below, the School Overlay Zone is generally located east of the Jackson Township/Lakewood Township border, northeast of Farady Avenue, west of West Cross Street (also known as Ocean County Route 526), and south of Maplehurst Avenue.
Currently, this zoning district permits schools with the following design regulations:
Minimum Lot Area — 40,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width — 150 feet
Minimum Lot Width — 150 feet
Rear Yard Setback — 30 feet
Side Yard Setback — 15 feet with an aggregate of 40 feet
Maximum Building Coverage — 20%
Maximum Building Height — 35 feet
Buffer from a residential use or district - minimum of 20 feet.
The proposed School Overlay Zone will permit for additional uses on a larger lot.
Currently, dormitories are only permitted as a Planned Educational Campus which requires a minimum of 3 acres and is only permitted for a school which is accredited to give a graduate degree.
The proposed Ordinance retains the 3 acres minimum but eliminates the accreditation requirement.
The proposed Ordinance permits "public and private schools... and... dormitories for housing of all or a portion of the student population. Residences on school properties shall be owned by the school and shall be for the purpose of providing housing for staff and administrative personnel affiliated with said school."
More pertinently, the "School Overlay Zone shall permit limited residential development. Said limited residential development shall be limited to single family and/or multi-family housing owned by or for the use by the school upon property that is either (a) the same property as the school; or (b) contiguous property sharing a common property line; or (c) property located on the opposite side of the same street as the school. The housing shall be for members of the staff, including teachers and administration affiliated with the school.
"Residential Development Standards: For proposed residential development associated with school use, on lots with three (3) acre minimum developed for schools, the maximum gross density in the area of the tract devoted to residential development shall not exceed one duplex (2-family) per acre. For purposes of calculating the residential density, the tract area devoted to residential development shall be deemed to include all of the properties not developed with school and/or uses ancillary to the school. The following are Permitted Residential Uses on school tracts:
(a) single family attached
(b) multi-family housing, including:
(i) duplexes
(ii) townhomes
(iii) apartments
(iv) condominium (not for sale, but for financing purposes only)"
Let's slow down and back up a second here.
The proposed Ordinance will permit "staff housing" at either "one duplex (2-family) per acre" or "apartments."
How many apartments??
The proposed Ordinance doesn't specify any limits. However, the proposed maximum building height gives us a clue.
The existing zoning ordinances permit a maximum building height of 35 feet for schools.
The proposed Ordinance increases this to 65 feet high.
Importantly, the proposed Ordinance clarifies that this height applies to both the school building as well as the residential apartment building!
The proposed design regulations are as follows:
Minimum lot area: 3 acres
Maximum building height: 65 feet
Minimum lot area: 3 acres
Minimum lot width: 75 feet
Minimum front yard setback: 50 feet
Minimum rear yard setback: 25 feet
Minimum side yard setback: 15 feet with an aggregate of 30 feet for both sides.
Maximum building coverage: 40%
Maximum building height: 65 feet
Accessory building setbacks: Minimum side yard 10 feet; minimum rear yard 15 feet.
Buffer requirements: Minimum of 15 feet shall be maintained as a landscaped buffer between the perimeter boundary of the School Overlay Zone and any development of property within the School Overlay Zone.
Oddly, while the Ordinance requires parking for the schools, the Ordinance does not specify a parking requirement for the residential apartments.
So... um... what exactly is the big plan for traffic flow in this new "school zone?"
Well... here is a verbatim quote from the proposed Ordinance:
To achieve the goals of the School Overlay Zone, it is critical that development of the infrastructure to support same occurs in a unified manner. Piecemeal development of same is discouraged.
Street Development. The School Overlay Zone shall be developed with multiple north-south streets, including Franklin Boulevard and Newport Road, to provide adequate and safe access by vehicles to the proposed schools and residences.
Unsure what exactly all that promises us?
You're not alone.
Oh, and here's the huge kicker:
All these apparent new "school style roads" will only be required to be paved 30 feet.
Typical new residential development roads in Lakewood are 32 feet wide. The Township Committee did not bother to explain why they believe that the new "school style roads" which are supposed to "facilitate both the orderly construction of schools and associated residential development for students and faculty along with necessary road and utility infrastructure" only need to be paved 30 feet wide. Township officials also did not bother to explain why the new "school style roads" at 30 feet wide is such a good solution to "the continued construction of schools in various zones in an often haphazard fashion [which] adversely impacts traffic flow throughout Lakewood" on 32 feet wide roads.
[Fun fact: Mesivta Ohr Chaim Meir's deed restricted lot is specifically included in the proposed zone eventhough most of the properties in the zone are across Cross Street. This is odd, considering that the Township Attorney is pretending to vehemently oppose the extinguishment of their deed restriction.]
The Committee's public meeting will take place today at 5:30pm.
Comments may be made via email up until 11:30 am at premeetingcomments@lakewoodnj.gov or during the meeting via comments@lakewoodnj.gov. Please include your name and address for the record.
To join a FAA News WhatsApp Group, click here.
To join the FAA News WhatsApp Status, click here.
6 comments:
Why is the town refunding a lien holder?
I think that permitting 65 feet high apartment buildings on roads of 30 feet wide is a "haphazard fashion [which] adversely impacts traffic flow throughout Lakewood."
Just watch. First they will sneak this through under the guise of it being "for school staff only," and then they'll say "now that they have approvals for hundreds of staff apartments, let's allow them to switch it to hundreds of regularduplexes."
This business with claiming that "the continued construction of schools in various zones in an often haphazard fashion adversely impacts traffic flow throughout Lakewood... supports the creation" of this proposal to permit 65 feet high residential apartment buildings sounds to me very much like the Township's determination "that due to evolving land use conditions it has since become necessary to" quietly include Yosef Kotler's office buildings on Pine Street into the "freebie tax cut zone."
Lakewood sure is a live comedy show!
where can we see a map of this zone
The township committee could care less about the people of Lakewood what a bunch of bums! as they hide behind the screen avoiding the public causing people to sit hours in traffic on Cross st when Lakewood is not affordable anymore for housing but they push more density for developers there's no forgiving for this behavior
What lien holder, for what?
Post a Comment